It’s been a spectacular week for the bulls… no doubt about it. Both the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 gained ground in all 5 trading sessions. In fact, the iShares Russell 2000 (IWM) hit fresh 52-week highs, closing in on territory not seen since the Lehman bankruptcy (9/2008).
Some attribute the new-found desire for stock assets to better-than-anticipated jobs numbers from February. Others believe the retail/consumer spending data came in strong. Still others see promise in the idea that the European Union is willing to help Greece, but on the EU’s terms.
However, one could just as easily agree with Pimco’s El-Arian that Greece is just the beginning of Europe’s problems in 2010, as Spain and Italy are next in line for debt discussions. Similarly, the Fed’s beige book addressed below-trend GDP growth in a week when housing sales continued to disappoint.
So why, then, have the U.S markets simply taken the positives to heart? The simple answer is… this correction is history. More importantly, why have the best ETF performers of the week come from either the most economically troubled countries (e.g., Spain, Italy, etc.) or the most resource-rich nations (e.g., Australia, South Africa, etc.)?
Of course, the reason for the risk in the above-mentioned country ETFs is entirely different. Australia and South Africa, while economically sound, are enormously dependent on the global growth story; that is, China and India and the rest of the world must be in a position to keep buying their “stuff.”
On the flip side, Spain and Italy are mired in recession/stagnation. Their sovereign debt is being described as unworthy. And the depreciating euro-dollar has taken the wind out of the sail for investing in the country’s companies, as they earn profits in euros.
One could infer two things from the return to riskier stock ETFs: (1) There’s still “love” for the global growth story, helping the resource-rich country ETFs, and (2) Europe may have been battered enough such that investors are scooping up perceived bargains.
(Note: I suggested the probability of some bargain-hunting 2 weeks ago. Review my 2/24/2010, “Any Hope For Spain, Italy and Other European ETFs?“)
Keep in mind, risk is a word that can be used in many different ways. Here, I am essentially employing risk to describe price volatility.
| Select International ETFs Over 5 Days and 3 Months | |||||||
| % Gain (1 week) | % Gain 3 Months | ||||||
| iShares MSCI South Africa (EZA) | 8.3% | 2.2% | |||||
| iShares MSCI Spain (EWP) | 6.7% | -14.7% | |||||
| iShares MSCI Australia (EWA) | 6.0% | 1.0% | |||||
| iShares MSCI Netherlands (EWN) | 5.9% | -2.4% | |||||
| iShares MSCI Italy (EWI) | 5.5% | -10.5% | |||||
| U.S. S&P 500 SPDR Trust (SPY) | 2.7% | 2.8% | |||||
Now take a look at the 3-month numbers. The broader S&P 500 (SPY) Trust is leading both types of riskier stock ETFs. However, if the trend towards accumulating riskier stock assets continues, expect greater percentage gains from the “beaten-downs” of Europe and global growth beneficiaries like Australia (EWA) and South Africa (EZA). You can think of it as… “more room to run.”
Disclosure Statement: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. The company and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds and/or index funds mentioned above. The company does not receive compensation from any of the fund providers covered in this feature. Moreover, the commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities.
No comments:
Post a Comment